PHIL 101 UArizona Polemarchus Conceived Justice as Good & Admirable Thing Discussion

Description

1000 words minimum, composed in your own words. Quotations from the book are permitted
(and they can make your paper better) but they do not count towards this 1000-word
requirement. Your paper must be single spaced, 10 point font size, on a regular 8.5 x 11 paper
size with 1” margin. Your name must be at the top, with this title: Paper One for PHIL 101.
Save your paper with a filename that starts with your last name and then says ‘paper one’ –
looks like this: Nixon paper one.docx Note – do not use google docs or Apple files.

In your paper, you have to accomplish two things.

First, explain why Socrates thinks that dividing up a country into classes, where each person
must be loyal to one’s own class and accuse the other classes of injustice, can never lead
towards justice. In other words, why is Polemarchus wrong about justice? After all, typical
people in a fight for equality hate all opposition, just as Polemarchus would.

Second, explain why, according to Socrates, would it be unwise to think one’s own group has all
the goodness and the rest of society is evil? In your answer, be sure to think about the mistakes
that blind loyalty can lead to, and the long-run consequences to dividing up society into good
and evil sides. If Socrates is right, and Polemarchus is wrong, how should a group struggling for
justice deal with hatred?

Solution:

We have the solution to this question. However, to avoid posible plagiarism, let us provide a fully custom and original solution. Please talk to any of our homework helpers via the chat icons at the bottom of your screen.

Psst!!! Let us do your homework for you!

Do you need expert help with your homework? Are you busy and would like an extra hand with your essays, homework and assignments? Try us today for the best grades in class!

Send us a message!

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top